Mike discusses President Trump’s pardon of Michael Flynn and the likelihood of more pardons to come, the transition from a Trump to a Biden presidency, what to make of Biden’s top picks so far, and the prospects for another round of COVID relief passing Congress before the end of the year.
Mike talks about a change of direction for the podcast and outlines his vision for a new American political party (which really needs a name) based on equality and respect for life, liberty (both negative and positive) and the pursuit of happiness.
10 days after the 2020 presidential election, Mike urges calm and makes a case for why nobody is going to steal this election. He argues that not only is President Trump well within his rights to challenge results in key states, but it might actually be the right thing to do. That said, he also thinks that there’s an important difference between supporting President Trump’s right to launch legal battles and supporting his extraordinary claims absent sufficient evidence.
After that, Mike takes a look at the White vote and wonders why it is that a Democratic presidential candidate hasn’t been the choice of a majority of White voters in over half a century. He thinks that a political party based on economic populism and without the baggage of the left or the right would have widespread appeal, and is even working to set up a party like that and possibly even run for office himself. (Yes, he knows how outlandish that sounds. Then again, if someone had told him as late as 2014 that Donald Trump would be the next President of The United States…)
Mike’s Daily News Routine:
AP Top News
Washington Post – Today’s Paper
Jonathan Bernstein’s Early Returns email newsletter (free subscription)
There are still plenty of votes to be counted and lawsuits to be settled, but it’s looking like Joe Biden will emerge as the winner of an election that seems to have gone surprisingly well under the circumstances (despite many baseless accusations of fraud). Mike talks the weirdness of politicians, his pity for President Trump, anger at President Trump’s enablers, and the conservative case for supporting Donald Trump.